TABLES FOR
Dental Implants in the Diabetic Patient -- A Retrospective Study

Table 1 - Demographic Data

Table 2 - Anatomic Distribution of Implants Placed

Region	Total
Ant. Maxilla	45
Post. Maxilla	73
Maxilla	118
Ant. Mandible	46
Post. Mandible	63
Mandible	109
Total	227

Table 3 - Lengths and Diameters of Implants Placed

Length			Diameter
Length (mm)	Count		Diameter (mm)	Count
	Successful	Failures		Successful	Failures
7.0	7		3.0	2
8.0	3		3.75	164	7
8.5	2		4.0	24	7
10	54	6	5.0	13
12	3		Unknown	10
13	54	4	Total	213	14
15	54	1
18	20	3
20	6
Unknown	10
Total	213	14

Table 4 - Characterization of Failed Implants

Sex	Age	Position	Diameter (mm)	Length (mm)	Healing Period (mo)	Cause and Status
F	76	12	3.75	13	6	Surgical: soft tissue grew in between the implant and bone.
F	70	16	4.0	18	8	Surgical: Failed to integrate; immediate load
F	70	18	3.75	10	2.75	Surgical: Failed to integrate; immediate load
F	70	27	3.75	15		Surgical: Failed to integrate
F	70	29	4.0	13		Surgical: Failed to integrate; immediate load
F	70	30	4.0	13	2.75	Surgical: Failed to integrate
M	66	5	4.0	18	12.75	Surgical: Failed to integrate
M	66	8	4.0	10	12.75	Surgical: Failed to integrate
M	66	9	4.0	10	12.75	Surgical: Failed to integrate
M	66	14	4.0	18	12.75	Surgical: Failed to integrate
M*	65	18	3.75	10	3.75	Surgical: Failed to integrate
M**	65	19	3.75	10	3.75	Surgical: Failed to integrate
M	53	29	3.75	10	2.5	Surgical: Failed to integrate
M	75	4	3.75	13	4.75	Post-restoration failure: Bruxing and clenching

* Removed 7.5 months after exposure; never loaded.
** Removed 2 weeks after exposure; never loaded.
*** Months post-restoration at time of failure

Table 5 - Patient's Results By Stage Achieved

	Number of
Stage	Patients	Implants	Successful Implants	Failed Implants
Surgery	34	227	----	----
Exposed, Failure	6*	13	0	13
Exposed, Successful, Not Attached	5	38	38	0
Attachment completed	29	176	175	1

* One patient had failed implants at exposure and other implants were successful at uncovering.